Technology and Science
Steve Jobs, 1955-2011
“No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don’t want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life’s change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true.
Your time is limited, so don’t waste it living someone else’s life. Don’t be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people’s thinking. Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.”
- Steve Jobs, Stanford commencement address, June 12, 2005
I’m sure this quote is pasted all over the internet by now (you can read the full address here) , but it bears repeating. Few had the furor and drive that Steve Jobs had. Whether you liked him or not, or even liked Apple or not, few can argue the breadth of his accomplishments or the passion he had for computing.
If you were born in the 80′s, like myself, think of the first computer you ever used. It was an Apple IIe. I won’t even bother to ask if I’m correct. I am. Our exposure to computers in grade school was because of that man and his insistence on placing them there. His passion for making computers accessible, usable, easy, has more or less been driving by that man. I have not always agreed with his choices, his aesthetic, his bombastic nature or outright militancy for control at times, but I believe his contributions have far outweighed any detriments he had.
Make no mistake about it. The world has lost a great innovator, and he will be sorely missed. For myself, who’s calling in life was sparked by these magical devices, I can barely envision a world without him.
Rest in peace Steve.
Google+
Google+.
By now, you have it. It’s amazing how quickly this thing has taken off, be it that new car shine, or that everyone loves to bash on Facebook.
While you could debate the pros and cons of both, I figured I’d stay away from that and explain what exactly Google+ is, and maybe what Google might be trying to do.
Most of you have a @gmail.com address. It was the first thing Google launched, and we all got one. Nice enough. But what that actually got you was a google account.
This is an important realization to make. Google is, in their words, about “organizing the world’s information”, and to do that, they are rolling out services to provide you with that. Google+ is merely the latest, and it builds on a number of previous services.
Google+ is not really a new social network, in that you join it. It’s just there. Forget for a moment that you had to be invited, because soon everyone will be able to just enable it like they do every other service. When activated, Google+ does the following things:
- Creates you a profile: This is built largely off the info already available at https://profiles.google.com.
- Your friends are pulled from your google contacts (http://www.google.com/contacts)
- Building on the above, gmail and gchat are derived from those contacts.
- Posts and other items are pulled from Picasa, Buzz/Google Reader, and Blogger. (all Google systems)
So notice, right off the bat, you already have content. It’s elegant, and brilliant, and even devious. And once it goes open, you’re there. Nothing else required.
Now that being said, Google did learn something with the Buzz fiasco, in that people don’t like all of their stuff being shared spontaneously. So while you may be invited to Google+ or have it activated one day, that doesn’t mean that everything will suddenly become visible (and indeed, some people actually think that’s a detriment to its potential success)
It also means, for those of you using it, you’ll have to do some things to get it to work the way you want. Rather than going through everything step-by-step and reinventing the wheel, I’ll just point you here on what is basically a user-written user manual. Don’t be scared, it’s small and reads well.
There seems to be a lot of misconceptions about what Google+ is as well, partictular people coming off Facebook looking to give it a try. Circles is the big one. This is an important point, so I’m going to state it plainly:
Circles are not Groups.
Let me explain. In Facebook, you could create a group and invite people into it. That doesn’t exist in Google+. Circles are meant so that you can organize your friends into different categories like you could on Facebook. Only, the category functionality on Facebook is somewhat buried now. The circles allow you to sort people so that you can switch feeds with a click, and also control what you share with whom. Anything you post, be they photos or links or whatnot, will have a box with blue icons in which you can type in the name of a person or a circle, or all of your circles. Seems complicated? Probably is, and honestly, I wonder how many people will really use that functionality (even though they’ve been clamoring for it on FB.) but there you have it.
Also. Connected accounts. Use Twitter? A blog? Facebook? Those can be linked in with Google+. One thing I see happening quickly is people not knowing which network to share and post things to; I can’t see anyone wanting to post the same link three different places. The quicker Google+ makes it easier for everyone to do this, the better. For me, this is one area that Google Reader/Buzz really shine, in that I like to share links with people for things I find, and it’s just one mouse click to flag something in my Google Reader RSS feed to share/comment on something with everyone. It’s completely replaced bookmarks for me.
So those are my notes so far. Those of you looking to add me can search for “Chris Kozlowski” easy enough. I’ll add more tips and resources on here as I find them.
Until then, enjoy. =)
Is this the Droid you are looking for?
I’ve been on a bit of a social media kick as of late, starting up a Twitter account and launching a new website. I place a lot of blame for that on my smartphone. Having slowly gotten hooked on the concept of mobile e-mail by my work Blackberry (gateway drug?) I planned on getting a Storm2 soon after it’s release. Reviews for the device were mediocre, but many were glowing in praise for Motorola’s Droid, the Google Android powered device also being offered on Verizon’s network.
“Why didn’t you jump on the iPhone?” you ask. Variety of reasons. For one, I’m not a big early adopter of personal electronics and social apps. Not sure why. My PCs are cutting edge, but I didn’t get an iPod till the 4th generation. The Droid represented my first foray into smartphones (aside from my work blackberry, and that was slow in coming.) In some cases it’s a lack of device maturity, in others, I fail to get taken in by the hype. It’s probably a personality issue; the more everyone jumps on something, the more unlikely I am to do so myself, an irrational thought that what’s suddenly good for everyone is, for that reason, not good enough for me or something. But I usually come around eventually, and that has it’s own rewards, in that I’m usually introduced to a more polished product.
So life has been different with a smartphone in my pocket. And with it has been the desire to use more and more of the “web 2.0″ everyone talked about so much, because now it suddenly makes sense. It’s far from a phone in your pocket, it’s a computer in your pocket, and with the cellular network, it’s having the world with you at all times.
I can share trivial things, quickly and with little interruption. “I saw this, and it’s cool.” Is it important? Probably not. But quick text and “status” updating apps such as Facebook and Twitter have made it easy to share the odds and ends we run into every day. The key to this though is not only the ability to share these things quickly and with little effort, but to read and absorb them with little effort as well. I think this last point is the more important of the two, and it finally clicked to me the other day that this is the reason Twitter is so popular. I can get very brief, simple updates from many people, and it all but takes a few seconds. This seemlessness is what makes is so much more convenient and appealing over a direct e-mail or phone call.
The result of this also is that we can rack up social points and time with people without having to establish a dedicated conversation over the phone or so, which isn’t always convenient. And it enables interaction with many people at once, instead of overly focusing on one.
That’s not to say that face-to-face time has suddenly fallen by the wayside. But for the times when you want to have trivial conversations with someone throughout the day, it’s a welcome development.
The information at one’s fingertips astounds me. I get traffic info on my phone. My fiancee e-mails me grocery lists. I have my full calendar with me in my pocket, which syncs to the cloud, and to my friend’s calendars as well if I wish them to. (Which is awesome when you’re planning for a group.) Ask a question, and I can wiki it on the spot.
On the techie side of things, the fact that 3G and cellular networks in general are becoming more and more like a general internet service is evident in it’s networking capabilities. I can tether a computer network to my phone, forward all of the traffic over an SSH tunnel to a proxy server at home, or any other number of things. (The ability to do this and establish a Remote Desktop connection on my phone still awes me.)
Of course, many of these things are not unique to the Droid. iPhone will do it, Windows 7 Mobile will do it, other Android devices will do it, as will Palm. Pick your poision. Eventually though, just as we saw with camera phones and color screens, we’ll all have one of these. I do find that rather cool.
There are of course, changes and consequences of any great technological change. Here’s a few I can think of just off the top of my head:
- The current regulatory climate is ill-prepared for these sorts of services. Cable networks, phone networks, cellular, and internet, are all regulated differently. But these services all ceased to be different a long time ago. All of these networks all run on Internet Protocol now, and all of them deliver some if not all of the services the other provides. The only differing mechanism is the physical medium easy service uses. Rules need to be drawn up for “Information Services” (since that’s what all of these are) and placed under that framework.
- Some commentators have been warning of security issues on the phone in the past. If they were early then, they arn’t now. This is a full-blown computer in your pocket, and has all of the same attack surface as your PC at home. As these are becoming more ubiquitous (and they are), this will become more and more of an issue. Smartphones, (which again, are really pocket computers) are not thought of as devices in the same class as a desktop or laptop. This will need to change quickly.
- Many privacy issues exist. I’m not necessarily talking about wiretapping. One of the key differences between your smartphone and your PC is that you control your PC. You have physical access to it, you can build your own, wipe it, load your own software, etc. It is your device, and so long as it understands Internet Protocol, you are free to control it as you wish. This is not true of your phone. With the exception of the few handful out there hacking apart Android, your phone company controls your handset. It’s features and functionality are ultimately delegated to you by your service provider. We’ve seen the dangers of network operators who abuse this control. It will need to be something that’s carefully looked at. Google’s Nexus One concept is promising in that it removes the provider from the handset, but it is by no means a total cure.
- We’ve seen these people: Persons talking on the phone in their car. Persons furiously typing away at their Blackberries in a meeting, elevator, or even while you’re talking to them. Extraordinary convenience creates extraordinary temptation to “check” on things every few minutes. I’m totally guilty of this. This is not a technological problem, but a human one. Self control. The recipient of a phone call or e-mail does not demand automatic response. People cannot expect an immediate response from you where you provide no expectation of one. This is an option I think people don’t exercise often enough.
That’s enough out of me for now. Do you have a smart phone? What do you use it for? What are you hoping to use it for? If you’re pressuring friends to get one (like I am. =) what are you hoping they’ll use it for? Post below!
What I'm Doing...
- Passed my CISSP test. =D 2012-01-06
- @a2alien absolutely... in reply to a2alien 2011-12-16
- Goals that go "ding!" off the crossbar are the best goals. =D 2011-12-12
- @CCP_TonyG Really sorry to hear that. =( Hang in there. in reply to CCP_TonyG 2011-10-21
- RT @hnbot Akamai close to being acquired by Google (Discuss on HN - http://t.co/512WnIEP) http://t.co/Vmje8jym Woah!!! 2011-10-12
- More updates...
Powered by Twitter Tools